GAP Lecturers Perceptions and Preferences in Scientific Research and Publication Activities

Dhian Tyas Untari(1Mail), Rini Wijayaningsih(2), Bintang Narpati(3), Tyna Yunita(4),
(1) Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia
(2) Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia
(3) Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia
(4) Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia

Mail Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 Dhian Tyas Untari, Rini Wijayaningsih, Bintang Narpati, Tyna Yunita

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v1i6.74



Abstract


This study aims to look at the GAP between lecturers' perceptions and preferences related to research activities and publications. Question material related to Perception and Preference aspects. Before the workshop, a questionnaire was given to assess the Perception aspect, then after the workshop, respondents were again given the same question to assess the Preference aspect. The data is in the form of cross sectional and is processed using descriptive statistics and GAP analysis models. Before conducting research and publication workshops, lecturers' interests and perceptions were still very minimal. But after the activities of the Lecturer began to be interested and interested in researching and publicizing. As a suggestion, this activity should be carried out continuously and continued with assistance so that the developed interest can be implemented in real activities.

Keywords


GAP analysis, Lecture, Tridarma, Indonesia

References


Amelia,M dan Rahmaida, R. (2017). Produktivitas Ilmiah Peneliti Indonesia pada Penelitian Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia Berdasarkan Basis Data Scopus 1990-2015. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 13(2), 241–251.

Inggriyani F dan N. (2017). Pengaruh Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Narasi Siswa Kelas V Di Sekolah Dasar. JPSD. 3(2). JPSD. 3(2)., 105–116.

Inglesi-Lotz, R., & A. P. (2013). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. Scientometrics, 129 –139.

Kademani, B., V. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. Sagar, L. Mohan, & G. S. (2005). Publication Productivity of the Bioorganic Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: A Scientometric Study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 135-146.

Margaretha M dan Saragih S. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Produktivitas Penelitian Dosen Sebagai Implementasi Integritas Profesi. Zenit. 1(3)., 195–208.

Wardani, P. (2012). Hubungan MInat Menulis Resensi Dengan Kemampuan Menulis Resensi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Widya Gama Malang. Unpublished Manuscript Universitas Negri Malang.

Wichian, N. S. S. W. and S. B. (2009). Factors Affecting Research Productivity of Faculty Members in Government Universities: Lisrel and Neural Network Analysis. Kasetsart J. (Soc. Sci). 30, 67–78.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 90 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.