The Effectiveness of Implementation Family Planning Village Program at Village Beting of Bugis Dalam Subdistrict East Pontianak District in Pontianak City And Village Sepadu Semparuk District Sambas Regency

How to Cite: Rianawati, M., Mokhtar, A., Lutfi, M., Primastuti, G. (2020). The Effectiveness of Implementation Family Planning Village Program at Village Beting of Bugis Dalam Subdistrict East Pontianak District in Pontianak City And Village Sepadu Semparuk District Sambas Regency. International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics, 2 (3), 136-144. DOI : https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v2i3.161


Introduction
The National Population and Family Planning Agency (BKKBN) is one of the Non-Ministry Institutions that has the mandate to realize the Development Priority Agenda (Nawacita) Government of the 2015-2019 period, especially on the 3rd Priority Agenda "Building Indonesia from the Edge by Strengthening Regions and Villages in the framework of the Unitary State", the 5th Priority Agenda "Improving the Life Quality of Indonesian People" and the 8th Priority Agenda is "Revolution of the Nation's Character through Population and Family Planning Development". An effort to realize the priority agenda, the BKKBN must be able to implement The goal of reducing the rate of population growth is due to the population growth rate which is directly proportional to the population quantity. The increase in LPP will make it difficult for the government to provide basic needs of the population, such as clothing, food, housing, jobs and income. Based on 2015 Interdental Population Survey (SUPAS) data, the rate of population growth in Indonesia in 2016 was 1.43 percent. When compared with the results of the Population Census (SP) in 2010, LPP decreased by 0.06 percent, where in 2010 LPP was 1.66 percent.
The results of the 2012 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (SDKI) showed that the total fertility rate of West Kalimantan (TFR) was quite high at 3.1 children per woman. In addition to the IDHS, another survey that annually measures the TFR is a survey of the RPJMN KKBPK program performance indicators. Based on the 2016 RPJMN KKBPK program performance survey, TFR West Kalimantan 2.30 children per woman. Likewise with the participation in KB (Contraceptive Prevalence Rate) there has been an increase in the use of modern contraception, but the increase in the past decade has been quite slow. The increase in use of modern contraception increased from 41.4 percent (1991 IDHS) to 50.6 percent (1994 IDHS), then to 58.1 percent (1997IDHS), 57.8 percent (2002  The basic proponents of the KB Village activities come from regional units at the level of citizen association (RW), RW or equivalent which have certain criteria where there is integration of the Population, Family Planning and Family Development program and related sectors which are carried out systemically and systematically (BKKBN, 2017).
In essence of the KB Village was created to improve the quality of life for the people even though they are in the lowest hierarchy of government. For this reason, the implementation is also carried out at the village level or equivalent through population activities; family planning and reproductive health; family resilience and empowerment (family development); and the development of related sectors (tailored to the needs of the region) in order to realize quality small families (BKKBN, 2017).
In addition, the KB village was formed to increase cross-sector cohesiveness, so that the intervention was more focused on integrating the implementation of programs and activities with partners, so that in the KB Village Technical Manual, the special purpose of the KB village was The KB village becomes a reflection of the implementation of KKBPK Program activities in full and integrated with related cross-sector activities (Ministries/Institutions, work partners, stakeholders, agencies) according to the needs and conditions of the region where the benefits are received directly by the community. In practice the implementation of the program and its activities target all segments of society at the lowest level, such as Fertile Age Couples (PUS), adolescents, the elderly population, families with children under five, families with adolescents, families with the elderly, and related sector targets according to their respective fields of work respectively. The program implementation also involved all village officials such as Village/Heads of neighbor association, Heads of citizen association, PKB/PLKB/TPD, Field Officers, PKK, PPKBD / Sub PPKBD, Community Leaders/Customary Leaders/Religious Leaders and Cadres.
An area that will be used as a location for implementing the KB village program has mandatory requirements that must be met, including support and commitment from the Regional Government, availability of accurate population data and information and active participation from the community (BKKBN, 2017). The support and commitment of the Regional Government is obtained through the commitment and active role of all agencies/work units, Regency/City, District and Village/Village Governments in providing support for programs and activities that will be carried out in the KB village and willing to provide services to the community in accordance with their field of work respective agencies to improve the standard of living of the community. In operational research on the development of the KB village management model carried out by Dawam and Fadila (2016) The successful implementation of KB village activities is determined by the synergy of the KKBPK Program activities with other agencies/sectors with the aim of improving the welfare of the community in the KB village. Operational research carried out in Gampong Batee Raya, Juli District, Bireun Regency and Sepa Village Amahai District and Central Maluku Regency, intensive commitment and support was provided by the Population and Civil records and Agriculture Services. (Dawam & Fadila, 2016). Other mandatory prerequisites are the availability of accurate population data and information sourced from the results of Family Data Collection, Village Potential data and Civil Registration data that can be accurately used as a basis for determining priorities, targets and programs that will be carried out in the KB Village continuously.
The next prerequisite is the active participation of the community, community leaders, religious leaders, traditional leaders and the private sector in the management and implementation of all activities that will be carried out in the KB family in a sustainable manner in order to improve the living standards of all the people in their area. This is in line with the results of operational research on the KB Village that has been carried out, that in the formulation of the "Integrated KB Village Program Management" model, the implementation of its activities cannot be separated from community participation, because the management and implementation of this program can be sustainable if there is participation from and by the community independently (Dawam & Fadila, 2016).
The implementation of KB village activities is based on the Allocation of Schedule of Activities (AJK) that has been determined in advance through a preparatory meeting by the relevant Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) at the Regency level. KB village activities are carried out monthly and weekly at various levels, beginning with district/city level workshops organized by representatives of the Provincial BKKBN. At the sub-district level, a mini workshop was held which was participated by stakeholders. Followed by a mini workshop at the village/sub district level and training of village/sub district cadres (according to the Working Group). After training at the village / sub district level, cadres together with Toga / Toma implement IEC to the community and foster family resilience through group activities and integration of allied programs with other sector activities.
The results of operational research (Dawam & Fadila, 2017) show that if coordination meetings and forums are held routinely, then the continuity and development of activities in the KB village will be maintained .aimed at enhancing the role of the Government, Regional Governments, Non-Institutions Government and private sector in facilitating, providing assistance and coaching to the community so that they will actively participate in improving the quality of life of the community. Some issues that need special attention include the high TFR (3.1) of women of childbearing age and the increasingly weak implementation of the KKBPK program in the field. Based on the results of the evaluation of activities and program achievements, then several strategic innovations were formulated to strengthen the KKBPK Program for the 2015-2019 period, especially in the form of priority activities that have a leverage on efforts to achieve the targets/ targets set and broaden the scope of the KKBPK program at all levels the region. KB Village has become one of the strategic innovations to be able to implement the priority activities of the KKBPK Program as a whole at the lowest level. KB Village is a miniature form/model of the total implementation of the KKBPK Program as a whole which involves all Fields in the BKKBN environment and synergizes with Ministries/Institutions, work partners, relevant agency stakeholders according to the needs and conditions of the region, and is carried out at the lowest level of government (according to prerequisites location determination of KB villages) in all regencies and cities.

Method
This research is an evaluative study with data collection carried out through quantitative and qualitative approaches (mixed methods). The qualitative approach aims to obtain in-depth information about input, process, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and reporting as well as achievement indicators of the success of the KB Village Program involving various cross-sectors, namely; Local Government (Pemda), TOGA/TOMA, manager of KB Village and community participation. As for the quantitative approach, researchers use it in order to collect data and information in the form of numbers related to the effectiveness of the "village of family planning" program.
In addition, data collection instruments with a qualitative approach were carried out by in-depth interviews with various informants. While the quantitative approach was carried out using a structured questionnaire to obtain an overview of knowledge, attitudes and community participation related to activities contained in the KB Village Program.

Qualitative Result
There are three main things that can be taken into consideration as the establishment of the KB Village. First, the availability of accurate population data. Second, the support and commitment of the Regional Government (Pemda), and Third, the active participation of the community. What is meant by accurate population data is the results of data acquisition sourced from family, village potential, and civil registration. The data is considered as an accurate standard data so that it can be used as a basis for determining priorities, targets and programs that will be carried out in the KB village area or area on an ongoing basis.
The following researchers describe three criteria used in selecting or determining the area that will be the location of the KB Village, namely: a. The main criteria include two things: (1) The number of Pre-Prosperous (poor) and Prosperous Family (KS) 1 is above the average of Pre-Prosperous and Prosperous Family (KS) 1 at the village / sub district level where the KB Village is located, (2) The number of KB participants is below the average target achievement of KB participants at the village / sub district level where the KB Camp is located. b. Regional criteria, including 10 regional categories (one selected): (1) Slum, (2) Coastal, (3) River Basin (DAS), (4) Railways, (5) Poor Areas (including Urban Poor), (6) Remote, (7) Borders, (8) Industrial Estates, (9) Tourist Areas, (10) Populous Density. Furthermore, in determining the regional criteria that will be used as the location for the formation of the KB Village, one or more of the ten criteria can be selected.
c. Specific Criteria, including 5 things, namely: (1) Data criteria where each RT/RW has Data and Family Maps, (2) Population criteria where the participation rate of school-age population is low, (3) Criteria of family planning programs where KB participants Active and Long-Term Contraception Method (MKJP) is lower than the average achievement of the village / sub district level and the level of unmet need is higher than the average level of the village / sub district, (4) Criteria for family development programs where family participation in fostering family security, economic empowerment and youth participation in the activities of Generation Planning (GenRe) through the Center for Youth Information and Counseling (PIK-R) are still low, (5) Criteria for related sector development programs covering at least four areas, namely: health, economy, education, settlement and the environment, and can still be added to other programs in accordance with developments.
Furthermore, from the research data, it was found that information on the formation of KB Village in the Village Beting and Sepadu Villages was based on reason, the main criteria for the formation of KB Village were the number of Social Protection Card (KPS) and Prosperous Family (KS) 1 holders above the average. Average KPS and KS1 at the village level. Besides that, Village Beting and Desa Sepadu are also areas that are considered to be still slums and remote so that they need more attention. Other criteria which were also fulfilled were specific criteria, which in the aspect of data collection in each RT/RW had accurate population and civil registration data and visible active community participation, from preparation to declaration.
The 2015 Family Data Collection (PK-2015) was carried out in accordance with the mandate of the Law and Government Regulations (Perda) relating to providing family information and data to support the operational and management of the Family Planning and Family Development Population Program (KKBPK). To that end, the central government through the Central BKKBN has established an application system that aims to collect all collected PK-2015 data (BKKPPKB DIY, 2015).
Related to the use of 2015 PK data, the data is not the only data used in determining the area or location of the KB Village in this study, because in addition to the data the researcher as explained above also considers other aspects such as regional criteria or maps, data or Routine statistical information and data from across sectors. Utilization of data sourced from Family Data Collection (PK) in the KB Village area in the Beting Village and Sepadu Village areas is not optimal due to incomplete PK data, especially PK 2015, which has not yet been returned by the provincial party. Therefore, in order to complete the PK data is incomplete, each Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) uses supporting data in the form of routine statistical data or data contained in cross-sectors.
From the results of the research interview it can also be seen that the participation and commitment of the Regional Government and cross-sectoral in the implementation of the KB Village program is still very minimal both in the Beting Village and in Sepadu Village. In the Beting Village area, there were only 4 agencies that showed their commitment in relation to KB villages in 2016, namely the Health Office, the Settlement Office, the Education and Culture Office and the Agriculture Office. In 2017 only 2 agencies carried out special activities in the KB Village, namely the Health Office and the Public Works Office (PU).
For the Sepadu Village area, the commitment of the local government and cross-sector can be said to be better compared to Village Beting, because in 2016 there were 5 agencies that showed their commitment in the KB Village, namely the Health Service, Social Service, Agriculture Service, Fisheries Service and Public Works Service . In 2016, cross-cutting sectors that showed their commitment in the KB village of Sepadu, such as the Health Office, provided counseling material on Child Trafficking; Children's Day commemoration; outreach and training for the workforce.
Other offices that showed their commitment in the KB Village were the Agriculture Service in the form of Hospitality/ Coordination Entering the 2016 Harvest Period; Development and Formation of Women Farmers Group; Increased Food to Farmers Groups in; Promotion of Agriculture and Plantation Improvement; The Construction of the Farmers Business Road, the Fisheries Office promotes fish culture, the Public Workers Office monitors the irrigation and the socialization of the Community-Based Drinking Water and Sanitation Program (Pamsimas).
In 2016, the Health Office provided routine Integrated Service Posts (Integrated health center); the Settlement Office undertook infrastructure improvements such as environmental road repairs; improvement of environmental drainage; and revitalizing slums. The Office of Education and Culture provides School Supplies assistance. The Department of Agriculture provides assistance with hydroponic seedlings and fertilizer assistance.
In 2017, there were only two cross-cutting interventions in the Village Beting KB Village, namely the health department with routine integrated health center services and the Public Work Department with natural resources such as trench clearing, Bina marga in road construction, landscaping, Ciptakarya in building facilities. Community service on Saturdays and Sundays. In the same year, 2017, the Health Office conducted mass circumcision activities, free medical treatment, and routine integrated health center services. The Department of Agriculture builds the Irrigation Gate and provides fertilizer and seed assistance. The Public Work Department, through its surname service, is constructing roads and bridges in the KB Sepadu Village, Sambas Regency. From the research results also obtained information that the material and frequency of training received by the KB Management Team was felt to be very lacking. The contribution of the Regional Work Unit (SKPD) related to increasing the ability and skills of the KB Management Team in the framework of strengthening and encouraging the success of the KB Village was not yet seen. Implementers/organizers of training are mostly carried out by BKKBN, cross-sector/partner involvement namely Sambas PKK, Disperindakop and Sambas State Polytechnic. Other technical SKPD involvement in the empowerment/ enhancement of HR has not yet been seen. The training material is more directed at empowering women, such as making dishes from coconut sticks, Training to Improve Children's Creativity (making key chains), training on coconut stick weaving skills in tough women's groups and Training on Making Amplang Crackers. Activities / socialization for 2017 in the KB village Sepadu Village until the writing of this report has not been informed.
Regarding the infrastructure available at the KB Beting Village, Communication, Information and Education Media (IEC) Media in the form of KB program banners in front of the KB village door, Nameplate in front of the KB Service Post and in front of the PIK-R room and in front of the location BKR El-Betinq, there is also a media in the form of a gate that reads various BKKBN slogans, photos of activities are also neatly arranged in the KB Post. Related to the building / room, which is used as a KB post in Village Beting belongs to the home of one of the original inhabitants of Village Beting In relation to the building / room, which is used as a KB post in Village Beting belongs to the home of one of the original inhabitants of Village Beting that has been lent for KB program operations, which until now has also been paid by the owner of the house. In addition there is also the hall of Mr. Ceng which is a multipurpose room that can be used by the KB village team if needed, the building / hall of the village is also sometimes used to hold an activity carried out for the KB village.
In contrast to Beting village, in Sepadu village, IEC media are often seen in front of the village hall and at the edges of the Sepadu area, there is also the gate of the Sepadu KB Village, the signposts related to tribina (BKB, BKR, BKL) and UPPKS are also neatly arranged next to the village hall, a bulletin board can also be seen on the porch of the village hall, photographs related to family planning activities are neatly arranged on the information board and there is also a residence corner inside the village hall. For space and all its contents are also available in the village hall as the center of village-level KB family team association in Sepadu. As for the facilities in the form of MUpen and MUyan, it is the same as in Beting. Namely the village level KB team village does not have it, the existence of these facilities in the Sambas Regency. Thus, the infrastructure needed to carry out the KB village program has been fully met.
From the information from the Head of the KB Village obtained by researchers in Sepadu Village, it was explained that facilities and infrastructure to support KB Village activities, for example the KIE KKBPK Media, the Information Unit Car, the Service Unit Car, the supporting facilities / buildings, the available space. The same thing was also conveyed by the Semparuk Subdistrict that in order to support the KB Village, IEC was available, house renovations, Mupen KB, KB service car. Facilities and infrastructure (rooms, halls and sound systems), IEC media from related sectors are available. Support for facilities and infrastructure in the KB Village in both the Pontianak City Kampong Beting Village and in the Sepadu Village Sambas Regency are all available in full, but the problem is the ownership status of the facilities and infrastructure. In Village Beting, for example, buildings such as halls and command posts still have loans because they do not have their own posts. In addition, MUpen and Muyan are only found at the district/city level not at the village /sub district level.

Quantitative Result
Indicators of program achievement in the KB Village area in Beting Village on the aspect of reducing the number of KPS and KS1 cannot be identified because there is no accurate data collection yet. However, if seen from the number of family planning participants there was a significant increase in the number of preannouncements, namely 411 people and after the announcement, which increased to 471.
Active participants in the Long-Term Contraception Method (MKJP) also experienced an increase from initially 31 people to 42 people. Unmetneed at the time before the launch amounted to 13.64% decreased to 11.45%. For the Sepadu Village area, the number of KPS before 263 was announced and there was a decrease after the declaration to 255. For KS1, at the beginning before the announcement, there were 730 also increased to 767. While for the number of KB participants, which initially had 436 people, increased to 517 people. The number of active MKJP participants increased from 18 people initially to 28 people. In the aspect of unmetneed before the announcement, 22.94% decreased to 19.49% Knowledge and community participation related to activities and programs in the KB Village area in Beting Village have been obtained from the PPKBD/Sub PPKBD cadres, as many as 34 people (68%). Whereas in Sepadu Village, information about the KB Village was obtained from PPKBD / Sub PPKBD cadres, which only amounted to 7 people (14.29%), the rest information related to the KB village was obtained from community leaders as many as 14 people (28.59%), other sources as much 10 people (20.41%), from PLKB / PKB were 5 people (10.20%), PKK were 2 people (4.08%) and from nurses/midwives were 1 person (2.04%). There is no public participation outside the management in Beting, while in Sepadu there are 62 people.

Conclusion
Based on the results of the research discussion, it can be concluded several things as follows: 1. The establishment of KB Village in Beting Village and Sepadu Village has fulfilled three criteria, namely the main criteria, regional criteria and special criteria 2. Utilization of data sourced from Family Data Collection (PK) in the area of Village Beting and Desa Sepadu has not been carried out optimally.
3. Participation and commitment of the Regional Government (Pemda) and cross-sectoral in the implementation of the KB Village program is still very minimal both in Village Beting and in Sepadu Village. 6. Support of facilities and infrastructure in the KB Village in Beting Village or in Sepadu Village is available in full, but the ownership of the existing facilities and infrastructure is still unclear.
7. The achievement of program indicators for the KB Village in Beting Village on the aspect of reducing the number of KPS and KS1 cannot be identified because there is no accurate data collection yet.
8. Knowledge and community participation related to the KB Village program in Beting Village and Sepadu Village are felt to be less than optimal. In addition, information obtained from the community so far about the KB Village only comes from PPKBD/Sub PPKBD cadres, community leaders, PLKB / PKB, PKK, and from nurses/midwives.

Recommendations
Based on the results of the research, we recommend several things to improve the KB village program. Some recommendations are as follows: 1. For head district, it takes more attention to the KB village. So the activities planned by KB village team can be realized optimally. Then facilities that have not been fulfilled can immediately addressed.
2. For BKKBN, there is an increase in the frequency of socialization on the cross-sectors so that the information related to the KB Village program is clearly and evenly distributed. So that in the future there is expected to no longer the nature of the intersector is expected to be able to integrate activities in each area against activities in the KB village program.
3. For the OPD KB, there is more intense advocacy of the cross-sector to understand the fact of KB village is not the responsibility of BKKBN or OPDKB solely, but there is joint responsibility. Thus the expected cross-sector is more active role in the development of KB village through the role of each sector 4. For cross-sectors, it is necessary to increase the intervention of activities in the KB village, because the chosen location of the KB village is not only due to achievement but also lag and backuping in other areas. Therefore, the responsibility of development should be taken together by the entire stake holder so that the village can compete even better can be used as a miniature district-level development area/city. In addition, monitoring and evaluation need to be done routinely so that problems happening in the field can be immediately detected and can also be resolved immediately.

5.
For the KB village team, there is needed for administrative improvements ranging from recording to reporting so that the data resulting is completely accurate and the validity can be accounted for so that later expected data contained in reports can be used as a reference material for various parties to plan activities to be conducted in their managed of KB village.